It seems unlike criticism of Commodore, people can't deal with any criticism of Apple Hagiography, This is a misunderstanding of the folks interacting wit

It seems unlike criticism of Commodore, people can't deal with any criticism of Apple Hagiography, This is a misunderstanding of the folks interacting with you on this comment thread. Perhaps you grew up elsewhere and there is a language barrier. I'm not sure how else to explain it. This thread is filled with folks freely pointing out areas in which Commodore's offerings were superior, that the Apple II line clearly stagnated for a decade before culminating in the intentionally crippled IIgs. I don't see people even remotely promoting "hagiorgraphy", just folks (besides you) attempting to have a nuanced discussion. Not to mention my vested interest in Commodore/MOS since I grew up just a few miles from MOS' HQ and have even visited the building. So to suggest I am locked into a US/Apple-only view of personal computers in the 80s is absolutely absurd. Good day and good bye. I certainly hope the rest of your HN interactions are not like this.