Free software and proprietary software have big incentive problems, but the problems are different: In proprietary software, acting in a scummy way many times

Free software and proprietary software have big incentive problems, but the problems are different: In proprietary software, acting in a scummy way many times doesn't result in loss of profits, it may even increase profits. Free software has the problem that usually there are no hierarchies and, consequently, no responsibilities. That makes it harder to imprint a coherent vision on a project. It also makes it harder for non-software people (graphic designers et al) to join, since complex cross-discipline ventures require a lot of organization and structure. QA, writing docs and other "boring" jobs become an afterthought. I think the way to fix this is making free software organizations akin to commercial entities in their internal organization: have bosses and pay salaries, but still be non-profits so that the incentive to be scummy is small. The source of income being, obviously, donations.