3 ms·
Well, if drivers were considered employees, then they'd be protected from their employer retaliating against them for political activity: > But two sections of
by meatmanek 6y ago
Well, if drivers were considered employees, then they'd be protected from their employer retaliating against them for political activity:
> But two sections of the California Labor Code (sections 1101 and 1102) specify that private employers may not do any of the following:
>
> 1. Make, adopt or enforce any rule or policy forbidding or preventing employees from engaging or participating in politics or running for public office;
> 2. Make, adopt or enforce any rule or policy that tends to control or direct the political activities or affiliations of employees;5 or
> 3. Use the threat of job loss to coerce, influence or attempt to coerce or influence employees to take or refrain from taking any particular course of political activity.6
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/labor/harassment/political-retaliation https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/labor/harassment/political-reta...
Good thing we passed a law that forces Uber/Lyft to treat their drivers as employees.