> You realize of course, that the Commodore 64/128 were better than the Apple 2 and PET in every conceivable way? Disks were WAY faster on Apple II than C-64.

> You realize of course, that the Commodore 64/128 were better than the Apple 2 and PET in every conceivable way? Disks were WAY faster on Apple II than C-64. Also in the mid 80's when I was in elementary school, all my schools had Apple II's and all of them had 80 columns. I get the feeling it was better supported in software on Apple II than the options available for 80-column output on C64. Both of these were more important to business use than the C-64's SID or VIC chips.