4 ms·
this is bizarre. I do not see how just blocking a user isnt a sufficient form of moderation for party chat harassment, why would you need to bring in sony to th
by avlewis 6y ago
this is bizarre. I do not see how just blocking a user isnt a sufficient form of moderation for party chat harassment, why would you need to bring in sony to the mix of this??
- millzlane 6y agoIf you're egregiously violating their guidelines I would want Sony to be involved. I shouldn't have to block every racist bully I come across. The racist bully should be removed from the platform after a warning or two.
- avlewis 6y agoEhhh Id rather take the trade-off of just manually blocking than Sony taking a big brother approach. You may have a higher sensitivity to harmful words though. I think that having Sony intervene on every instance of a troll on a platform targeting young adult demographic is going to be a fairly tall task.
- duckMuppet 6y agoMore than this, by what standard is something blockable and who determines this. Maybe it just doesn't stop at allegedly hurtful words, Maybe two folks are discussing something political and someone else is offended by these hurtful ideas. I mean, Amazon just banned some books having an alternative Covid 19 narrative, so our isn't out of the realm of possibility..
- ddingus 6y agoCounterpoint: When people know how to manage a conversation, the bully faces strong norms that do not reward like righteous indignation does. You could laugh at them too. Works wonders, no joke.
- avlewis 6y agoI think both of these solutions are more preferable in my opinion.