Not that one counter example refutes your whole point, but I found the analysis of his record (this week’s edition) to be rather clear-eyed. I do agree that I’

Not that one counter example refutes your whole point, but I found the analysis of his record (this week’s edition) to be rather clear-eyed. I do agree that I’ve noticed a tinge of bias that didn’t seem there before, but to represent it as more than slight is incorrect based on my experience (been subscribijg for ~12 years) >>> The bulk of the analysis covers the period from 2017, when Mr Trump took office, to the end of 2019. We stop in 2019 in part because some data are released only annually, and in part because the pandemic has turned economies across the world upside down. Our conclusion is that, in 2017-19, the American economy performed marginally better than expected. (That conclusion remains if we follow the practice of some political economists, who argue that the influence of presidents on the economy can be discerned only after a year in office, and limit our analysis to 2018-19.)