4 ms·
If you actually looked at each of the other links, you'd noticed that they were all valid. I just picked the first one as an example of how seriously we should
by starfallg 6y ago
If you actually looked at each of the other links, you'd noticed that they were all valid.
I just picked the first one as an example of how seriously we should take your words at.
Now you start going on a tangent with meta-analysis of statistical data, comparing Sweden with America with no appreciation of the difference in the culture, lifestyle and handling of the coronavirus and then attribute their relatively good performance just to the lack of a mask mandate?
Give me a break, man.
- nickthemagicman 6y agoIf...editorial articles...count as valid scientific publications...than I'm going to write an editorial saying poop is gold, eat some taco bell, and retire! """comparing Sweden with America with no appreciation of the difference in the culture, lifestyle and handling of the coronavirus """ Where is the science regarding your claim that cultural differences invalidate country Covid rate comparisons. I see that in some of your historical comments on this site you compare different countries Covid rates despite their cultural and lifestyle differences. https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=starfallg&next=22685666 https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=starfallg&next=22685... Why does it not count in Sweden's case? Is one only allowed to compare countries when it supports your narrative? Can you please give me a break and be intellectually honest for two seconds?