4 ms·
Does anyone have evidence to back this up? I didn't look too hard, but the Wikipedia citation links to a page which links to pages that don't have any actual in
by mtogo 15y ago
Does anyone have evidence to back this up? I didn't look too hard, but the Wikipedia citation links to a page which links to pages that don't have any actual information on them.
- esoteriq 15y agoI looked at the cited page (http://www.humorwriters.org/startlingstats.html http://www.humorwriters.org/startlingstats.html) which is a weird writing workshop article that gets its information from a site that "helps writers get published." I smell something fishy here. I also searched the publishing site and found nada. Of course, I didn't do an exhaustive search, but still... Just as an aside, I wouldn't be surprised if some college grads never read a "proper book" after college. I don't think that means the end of literacy - we do read a lot on the internet...
- ja27 15y agoYes, I tried to follow the citations too and got nowhere. I find it hard to believe that they "never" read another book after college. I suspect that wording has been twisted and we don't know the survey subjects. Did they survey a bunch of 24 year olds?
- Alex3917 15y agoI have no idea what the methodology of the NEA study is, but at first glance it seems to be not true for literature: http://www.nea.gov/news/news09/ReadingonRise.html http://www.nea.gov/news/news09/ReadingonRise.html However, if you are counting only non-fiction then the Amazon data seems to confirm. True fact: There are 4.25 million babies born each year in the U.S., and the most popular parenting books on Amazon only sell around 75 copies per day. (I haven't looked at the data in a couple years, but you can get it via ranktracer or similar.)