3 ms·
To be clear, I'm not 100% convinced that any of it is true. I think it is likely that the emails are real and very likely that the photos are. As for the FBI -
by Ancapistani 6y ago
To be clear, I'm not 100% convinced that any of it is true. I think it is likely that the emails are real and very likely that the photos are.
As for the FBI - it's at best circumstantial evidence. If they had stated there was no open case I would have considered it to be strong evidence that it's all disinformation. The two possible outcomes from that facet are "disprove"/"not disprove".
- iaw 6y agoI've begun to wonder if it isn't somewhere in the middle. Perhaps the emails, texts, and photos are real but from a Russian hack and are being selectively released in an effort to paint Hunter Biden in the worst possible light hoping it reflects poorly on his father.
- Ancapistani 6y agoThat seems plausible to me. At the end of the day I don't think the source matters in terms of how I see the Bidens, only the authenticity of the information itself. If the later comes out that the stated source was a lie, then that will change how I see everyone involved on that side. If both the information and source are false, then I would strongly support severe criminal charges for those involved.