3 ms·
I'm not sure whether your comment is against Moon colonization specifically or more generally against the use of funds for space exploration. In the case of th
by tdfx 16y ago
I'm not sure whether your comment is against Moon colonization specifically or more generally against the use of funds for space exploration. In the case of the former I don't know enough about the potential of such a mission to pass judgment on it.
In the case of the latter, however, I find that those who oppose space exploration in favor of using the funds for the good of humanity now (feeding staving people, building domestic infrastructure, eliminating innumerable other social ailments) are only shortchanging future generations of our children by guaranteeing their extinction. Very smart people have repeatedly warned us that we cannot remain a single planet species and expect a future. I really can't think of anything more important to spend money on than the only technology that will be able to allow our species to survive.
- spot 16y agothere are two problems with your argument: 1) the technology we have now is inadequate for serious colonization. we are better off investing in basic science, education, health care, and the economy in general. we have to create the people who will create the science first. 2) NASA is the wrong way to do colonization, it should be private enterprise, which has a much higher appetite for risk.