4 ms·
Agreed. His “evidence” means nothing and his background is very shady. Those screenshots could be completely made up. Can someone else verify with raw data?
by jollofricepeas 6y ago
Agreed. His “evidence” means nothing and his background is very shady. Those screenshots could be completely made up.
Can someone else verify with raw data?
- bArray 6y agoI've tried from both GMail and Thunderbird, not able to repeat the experiment.
- megous 6y agoScreenshots are not completely made up. At least the `usg` HMAC seems to be valid, and timestamps are recent enough, so the redirector URLs are legit. Of course it's possible to generate the valid redirector URLs in other ways. So if this is a scam it's not a completely stupid scam. Anyway, A/B testing or gradual deoployment is a thing. I'll not turn against a fellow hacker and call him shady, just because a potential A/B gaslighing practice from some megacorp. ;) I'll just wait.