3 ms·
>But for a security-critical context such as this, Debian with it's stability and very security-aware package maintainership seems like a better choice. Or Cen
by URfejk 6y ago
>But for a security-critical context such as this, Debian with it's stability and very security-aware package maintainership seems like a better choice.
Or Centos.
- qz2 6y agoThis. Rationale is SELinux.
- joana035 6y agoLinux security modules, always good to have. AppArmor, SELinux, Smack, and TOMOYO are good examples.
- eikenberry 6y agoIn my experience CentOS means EPEL and EPEL means throwing that stability and security-aware packaging out the window.