I don't think he was claiming that Go is more fun for humans because computers are worse than humans at it. The statement was: "computationally interesting pr

I don't think he was claiming that Go is more fun for humans because computers are worse than humans at it. The statement was: "computationally interesting problem". I think he was thinking in terms of the challenge it posed to computing science, not whether or not humans found it enjoyable to play. But he also does seem to enjoy Go for its social benefits. 4kyu player myself. I enjoy how Go allows for extremely complex play with far simpler rules.