I've never had problems with three.js, which is what most people use for WebGL-powered content. Are you claiming that there's less effort in coding up a native

I've never had problems with three.js, which is what most people use for WebGL-powered content. Are you claiming that there's less effort in coding up a native graphics program that works across all platforms? Certainly native has the edge on performance (WebGPU will shorten the gap a bit), but on ease of multi-device compatability? I could be convinced, but it seems hard to believe. The whole idea of the browser (these days) is to make cross-platform stuff easier to develop.