4 ms·
This doesn't refute the original point. It may even reinforce it! Her father and mother imparted some excellent genes, raised their daughters, and taught them i
by rudiger 15y ago
This doesn't refute the original point. It may even reinforce it! Her father and mother imparted some excellent genes, raised their daughters, and taught them in a way no school can. Judit Polgár and her sister were possibly born geniuses. However, it may show that female geniuses (made or born) can be as good as male geniuses (made or born), if given the chance (which I believe).
- happy4crazy 15y agoI guess it depends on what the original point was--I took narrator's point to be that certain people have bigger chess smarts than others, where smarts is something that you're blessed with at birth. I may have read too much into that. And yes, I agree that a sample size of three + massive survivor bias makes for tricky interpretation :) But I think the Polgar story is fascinating; Laszlo had a theory about how to develop genius, and he (rather creepily!) decided to test it out. From Bounce [0]: Realizing that the only way to vindicate his theory was to test it out on his own future children, he started corresponding with a number of young ladies, in search of a wife... A young Ukranian named Klara was one of those women. "His letters fizzed with passion as he explained his theories of to produce children with world-class abilities," Klara, a warm and gentle lady, a perfect counterpart to her husband, tells me. "Like many at the time, I thought he was crazy. But we agreed to meet." What's more, Laszlo would take issue with saying his daughters were born geniuses. As Polgar puts it: "If they had seen the painfully slow progress, the inch-by-inch improvements, they would not have been so quick to call Susan a prodigy." [0] http://www.amazon.com/Bounce-Federer-Picasso-Beckham-Science/dp/0061723762/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1303742665&sr=8-2 http://www.amazon.com/Bounce-Federer-Picasso-Beckham-Science...