2 ms·

To the wikileaks, Hunter Biden is a private individual, I am much more ok with the publication of hacks of the government. Second, if they had redacted the PII

To the wikileaks, Hunter Biden is a private individual, I am much more ok with the publication of hacks of the government. Second, if they had redacted the PII (just the email and phone number really) I would've been more happy. To the illegal vs legal, it's much easier to find a trending story like this. It's on their radar. Finally, I would've preferred just a warning: You're leaving Twitter for a story that violates x policies. E: but in all honesty I'd prefer they be able to remove whatever they like. Let a new social network grow and fill that gap. Facebook has been under fire for pushing conservative tilted media, so it's not like this is a one sided problem.

abernard1 6y ago
> To the wikileaks, Hunter Biden is a private individual Let's just say that Hunter Biden is a private individual for sake of argument. The papers involve a corruption scandal involving a business transaction with his father who was Vice President of the United States with a foreign government. Jeebus. Is every person implicated in a foreign scandal who doesn't work for the (U.S.) government absolved from press? I have a hard time believing the Bush twins or Barron Trump would receive the same treatment.