5 ms·
I agree. NZ isn't very well traveled compared to the U.S. or most of western Europe. And NZ's population is like 1/20th of Los Angeles County. It's not surprisi
by c0nsilience 6y ago
I agree. NZ isn't very well traveled compared to the U.S. or most of western Europe. And NZ's population is like 1/20th of Los Angeles County. It's not surprising that the little island handled the virus so well--it'd be more surprising if they didn't.
- rasz 6y ago>NZ's population is like 1/20th of Los Angeles County. you are wrong by only one order of magnitude
- glaucon 6y agoGee, LA county has 100 million people in it ? Who knew ...
- moltar 6y agoNZ has more per capita tourists than US. NZ population: 4.89 NZ tourists: 3.7 (2017 figure) US population: 328.2 US tourists: 79.26 million international visitors to the U.S. This figure includes visitors from overseas, Mexico and Canada.
- lostlogin 6y agoWhat do you mean when you say ‘NZ isn't very well traveled compared to the U.S.’? I had a look about and according to the things I can find, New Zealanders travel abroad about twice as much as US Americans. And keep in mind that pretty much everywhere a New Zealander can go is more infected than NZ. We also have a lot less international clout than the US and less money. This matters. As a country we have less people per square km than the US, perhaps by half. But the US is not vastly more populated the New Zealand when examined as a whole, and USA is nowhere near the top when you order countries by population density. Our population is about 1/66th (5 million versus 330 million) that of the US, but our death toll is 1/8,900th (25 versus 224,000). I don’t believe the reasons you list explain this. In protecting its citizens New Zealand has done better than the average and the US has done worse. https://www.traveller.com.au/the-worlds-biggest-travellers--which-nationality-takes-the-most-trips-11979j https://www.traveller.com.au/the-worlds-biggest-travellers--...