5 ms·
Can you name another communicable disease where "herd immunity through natural propagation" is the recommended treatment? Even relatively less dangerous viruse
by joshuamorton 6y ago
Can you name another communicable disease where "herd immunity through natural propagation" is the recommended treatment?
Even relatively less dangerous viruses, like influenza, have strong vaccination programs, and relatively more dangerous viruses (measles, mumps, smallpox, etc.) are only words I know because of the vaccines I got as a child. I can't think of a disease with a nontrivial mortality rate that we don't aggressively vaccinate and have public health measures to prevent. Can you?
- pjkundert 6y agoIt’s the default treatment. Destroying civilization in the off chance that it might help is the approach that’s worrisome.
- jakemauer 6y agoCan I get clarification on your second sentence? Are you saying that approaches like New Zealand's are destroying civilization?
- ElCapitanMarkla 6y agoA few weeks of lockdown destroyed civilisation? With the exception of international travel, life is more or less as per normal in NZ right now. What are you even talking about.
- pjkundert 6y agoMonths of lockdown have destroyed somewhere between a quarter and half of all small businesses in Canada. The resultant unwinding of commercial real-estate debt hasn’t even begun. The deflationary spike and follow-on “riding the dragon” of inflationary response by central banks hasn’t even begun. When we finish consuming our personal reserves, and begin in earnest to try to supply food and lodging to the, what, 50% of the population not “employed” by government, what do you guess is going to happen. It will be illuminating, at least, to those who think they understand how civilization works...
- loeg 6y ago> Can you name another communicable disease where "herd immunity through natural propagation" is the recommended treatment? This was the standard of care for chickenpox (herpes zoster, aka shingles) until 10 or 20 years ago, for example. Sure, the mortality rate is lower, especially among healthy children.
- joshuamorton 6y ago> until 10 or 20 years ago You're off by a decade and possibly two. I'm older than 20, I was vaccinated for Chickenpox. The vaccine has been commercially available for 35 years. So I'd reiterate the question.
- Izkata 6y ago~20 years ago, naturally getting it was the go-to in our area. The idea was "let's just get it over with", because the vaccine isn't 100% effective.
- loeg 6y agoI'm less than a decade older than you (younger than 35!) and was intentionally exposed to chickenpox as a child at the advice of my pediatrician in the Seattle area. And I've had shingles in my 20s as well, so I'm certainly pro-vaccine. There may have been a vaccine 35 years ago (I'll take your word for it), but it was not the standard of care even ~25 years ago. (And to be clear, I'm not advocating for exposing people to COVID, at all. You asked a very broad question upthread with an easy counter-example — chickenpox — and I provided the counterexample.)
- hifly 6y agoThat’s complicated though. Getting it as an adult is REALLY nasty, hence the previous history to try and get it done as a kid. Now we immunise instead...
- ElCapitanMarkla 6y agoThe govt offers chickenpox vaccines here in NZ for kids now. I think it has been a fairly recent addition to the vaccination schedule but it was definitely there 3 years ago when sprog number one arrived.
- secondcoming 6y agoWell, back in the day if one kid got chicken pox other parents would bring their own children around so they could get the infection done and dusted. The younger the child the better.