> A strong vaccine candidate within the next 6 months is a strong likelihood There's zero evidence to support this assertion. First there's zero evidence that

> A strong vaccine candidate within the next 6 months is a strong likelihood There's zero evidence to support this assertion. First there's zero evidence that it's "strong", whatever that means. Second there's zero evidence that we'll have it in the next 6 months. Remember, it also has to be safe, not just "strong". Ensuring that takes a lot of time.