7 ms·
We actually don’t have this evidence. If anything we have strong evidence of the opposite. SARS-2 radiological abnormalities resolve in months and this is for
by __blockcipher__ 6y ago
We actually don’t have this evidence. If anything we have strong evidence of the opposite.
SARS-2 radiological abnormalities resolve in months and this is for hospitalized cases which are by definition more severe than your usual cases.
There is really no evidence of what you claim.
We’re now 7 months into the major part of this pandemic and people are still stuck citing the fears we all had in April.
- anoncake 6y agoThank you for this post and all the others. Where can I find the evidence you mention?
- __blockcipher__ 6y agoI have a dump of research papers I can send to you. Currently traveling so might take till tomorrow morning
- __blockcipher__ 6y agoSorry for the delay. https://pastebin.com/GeCpFhih https://pastebin.com/GeCpFhih very haphazard but at least will give you pointers to most of the studies
- ceejayoz 6y agohttps://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02598-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02598-6 > Evidence from people infected with other coronaviruses suggests that the damage will linger for some. A study published in February recorded long-term lung harm from SARS, which is caused by SARS-CoV-1. Between 2003 and 2018, Peixun Zhang at Peking University People’s Hospital in Beijing and his colleagues tracked the health of 71 people who had been hospitalized with SARS. Even after 15 years, 4.6% still had visible lesions on their lungs, and 38% had reduced diffusion capacity, meaning that their lungs were poor at transferring oxygen into the blood and removing carbon dioxide from it.