If we take the theory of natural evolution seriously then IMHO we should also take Gödel's incompleteness theorem seriously like Roger Penrose does. Note that

If we take the theory of natural evolution seriously then IMHO we should also take Gödel's incompleteness theorem seriously like Roger Penrose does. Note that he proposes both a problem and a solution, which are two separate entities. There may exist other solutions to cognition of incompleteness. I think that if the problem of and solution to incompleteness in cognition did not exist then we would experience these computational inconsistencies similar to migraine blind spots. However we don't, and we perceive the error in computation as a single entity and not as two boundaries.