3 ms·
Nothing in their post or the article says that things shouldn't be up for discussion. That's not even the point of it. The point has been about whether more po
by dagmx 6y ago
Nothing in their post or the article says that things shouldn't be up for discussion. That's not even the point of it.
The point has been about whether more powerful figures can use their platform to drown out the free speech of others and the lack of accountability.
The article is in fact calling for more accountability, which is precisely what your comment about discussion would be.
You're in effect reinforcing both the articles point and the points shared by the person you're replying to
- UncleOxidant 6y ago> The point has been about whether more powerful figures can use their platform to drown out the free speech of others The article isn't focusing on that aspect, though. It's suggesting that falsehoods and propaganda can flood the zone with so much shit that people are just tired of trying to sort though it to figure out what's actually true and what isn't. The modern (post-modern?) demagogue doesn't bother with curtailing free speech, they just put out many false narratives like Putin does. "The spewing of falsehoods isn’t meant to win any battle of ideas. Its goal is to prevent the actual battle from being fought, by causing us to simply give up."