3 ms·
Ha be really clear dude in this case, in this article it is not both sides. It is solidly the current administration and no one else. Our current party in power
by tonetheman 6y ago
Ha be really clear dude in this case, in this article it is not both sides. It is solidly the current administration and no one else. Our current party in power has done this.
So to retype what you said more correctly.
"I wish the Republicans would realize they are destroying..."
- wwwwwwwww 6y agoNobody is destroying anything. This sounds more like institutional interests being defended by those who work in the institution that is forced to be more efficient. Many will complain, and scream exaggerated warnings. But in the end, it will help to make things better.
- Retric 6y agoEnding things early without warning isn’t being more efficient, it’s simply not finishing the job.
- jimktrains2 6y agoWhat's being cut short isn't waste but the number of times that a non-responsive house can be visited. It's not some grand excise of waste, it's saying that the administration doesn't want to follow the procedures layout out by the census department to get an accurate count given previous data.