4 ms·
> They have to accept their role as central planner. That's the whole argument. Since everything that central bankers were doing is not working and falling ap
by dpc_pw 6y ago
> They have to accept their role as central planner.
That's the whole argument. Since everything that central bankers were doing is not working and falling apart, we need to take the dial to 11, and introduce a full central planing. A proper enlightened communism, for the people, by our omniscient leaders, who by precise control of asset prices and such will make sure everybody has exactly as much money as they should, according to their position in The Party, and prices of everything are "fair".
- ganafagol 6y agoSorry, that's just incorrect. Neither is that the whole argument nor is this about communism. As long as people scream "communism" when they see anything related to planning and ignore the rest of the argument, you're never going to have a balanced or even nuanced debate and instead just dumb black-and-white rambling. Like your post.
- dpc_pw 6y agoYou can call it whatever you want. It doesn't change the fact that it calls for these intelectuals-yet-idiots who are unaccountable, unelected, who couldn't tell a bubble even after it already hit them, and can't even admit what ridiculous mess they made out of the financial system and economy, to have more power and more or less directly tell everyone what to do, how can they can or can not accumulate and store their wealth, invest and pretty much live their lives. No, thank you. You can keep it if you like. It's not Bitcoin people forcing their shit on anyone.