4 ms·
> understanding the structure of knowledge is philosophy I would replace knowledge with arguments. Knowledge is already "solved" in many minds and it'll be har
by unabst 6y ago
> understanding the structure of knowledge is philosophy
I would replace knowledge with arguments. Knowledge is already "solved" in many minds and it'll be hard for philosophy to reclaim the word.
But arguments? I don't think so. No field is as deeply concerned about arguments than philosophy.
Tangible arguments are scientific arguments, which are a mere subset of philosophy. Modern philosophers have failed to market the superset.
- scoofy 6y agoI wasn't trying to be precise. I use knowledge in the sense of proposition. The interplay between deductive knowledge/frameworks, and inductive. I problem of that relationship is the core of why many of our mappings from the world to the framework of the world are so difficult.