4 ms·
I wish there were better self-hosted wikis. Most seem to be from the mid-00s and rock the look. None of them have real-time collaborative editing like Confluenc
by hamolton 6y ago
I wish there were better self-hosted wikis. Most seem to be from the mid-00s and rock the look. None of them have real-time collaborative editing like Confluence or Quip from my research.
- thenanyu 6y agoWe're working on a CRDT collaboration engine at Outline-Wiki https://www.getoutline.com https://www.getoutline.com. It can be easily and performantly self-hosted (though there's a saas version available) and it's open-source.
- momothereal 6y agoFair warning that it is under the Business Source License which isn't really open-source. I fully understand why this license was chosen (preventing resellers competing with your SaaS), but advertising as "open-source" is misleading. Your FAQ also says to "Contact [You]" regarding on-prem instead of pointing to the GitHub, which imo conceals the fact that you can build and run it without a restrictive license.
- btgeekboy 6y agoWiki.js seems to be up and coming in this space. It’s not full featured yet, but it feels like working with a modern web application, rather than a bunch of PHP. No real time collaboration though.
- dementik 6y agoI have used openkb for a while. Its fast, lightweight and MIT licensed. https://github.com/mrvautin/openKB https://github.com/mrvautin/openKB