> But as it stands, corporations are found to have free speech rights Sure. They have those right, just like a newspaper has those rights. But these companies

> But as it stands, corporations are found to have free speech rights Sure. They have those right, just like a newspaper has those rights. But these companies and newspapers are also liable for their speech. And the companies that are not liable for the speech, are companies like phone companies. Phone companies are required to follow certain restrictions, and the courts have found them to be perfectly legal. > What is the large, philosophical difference that separates them? Take the phone network, as an example. The courts already treated the phone network, differently than they do a newspaper.