4 ms·
They're using revocation of 230 as extortion to try to abridge the freedom of the press.
by bosswipe 6y ago
They're using revocation of 230 as extortion to try to abridge the freedom of the press.
- splintercell 6y agoDo you think conservatives are being censored by the big tech platforms? Would your answer pass the veil of ignorance?
- bosswipe 6y agoEverybody is being censored on all these platforms, it's called moderation. Most people appreciate it, including you or you would be commenting on 4chan instead of the heavily moderated HN.
- pyronik19 6y agoThat's really a manipulation of the term "moderation". They aren't removing swear words or nipples... They are deciding what is the "correct" information and then decide what we all get to see. If they got out of business because they abused the immunity grant they were given so be it. I won't miss them. All of social media can burn for all I care.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- throw_m239339 6y agoWell, conservatives should have thought about it like 10 years ago when that cabal against conservative point of view started on social media or in the Silicon Valley. Instead they chose to rely on businesses that were largely operated by "progressives" whatever it means today. They had an opportunity to create conservative social networks, they didn't. This isn't a good reason why section 230 should be revoked. Yes, Twitter is biased against conservatives, but that's OK, conservatives should go create their own Twitter, that's the point of the web anybody can create their own thing, the more competition the better.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]