3 ms·
I hear you but GPL makes it hard for everyone else (most companies have policies against GPL). We run an open-source project and it's AGPL licensed for the exac
by soumyadeb 6y ago
I hear you but GPL makes it hard for everyone else (most companies have policies against GPL). We run an open-source project and it's AGPL licensed for the exact same reason. But lot of orgs have blanket ban on AGPL.
Maybe there is a way to define "bad" practices in OS outside of license. Similar to how monopolistic practices are banned in business because they are unhealthy for the broader ecosystem. Just asking
- offtop5 6y agoOhh I get your point. What I'm saying is if your not ok with the biggest company on Earth using your code you need to release it GPL. Dual licencing is also a strategy, GPL is free and commercial usage can be $5,000 a year or whatever.