3 ms·
You did not mention anything at all about "narcotic." While, you write that you don't want to make assumptions, it sounds like you are already set in thinking
by rootsudo 6y ago
You did not mention anything at all about "narcotic."
While, you write that you don't want to make assumptions, it sounds like you are already set in thinking there is just two issues.
There is much more than just the black and white world you created with "psychedelic" and "opiate."
- Timpy 6y agoI said I didn't want to make presumptions specifically about the parent post's personal situation. I do not think there are only two issues. I did say the categories are hard to define. First paragraph of Wikipedia's Narcotic entry: "In the United States, it has since become associated with opiates and opioids, commonly morphine and heroin...". If you would give my point some charity, I think narcotics could fall into the broader opiate category I was talking about. Perhaps there is a better word for this category, I don't care what we call it, but the distinction is worth making that the drugs in these separate categories are dangerous is unlike ways. Every drug is a different issue. Widespread LSD use would cause a change in society, widespread heroin use would cause a collapse in society.