> The First Amendment protects every private enterprise's ability to set and enforce rules for acceptable content on their services. Doesn't this claim imply t

> The First Amendment protects every private enterprise's ability to set and enforce rules for acceptable content on their services. Doesn't this claim imply that the speech on twitter is in fact twitters speech? And that therefore forcing them to allow specific speech allows to forced speech? But in that case, shouldn't they be held liable? Does this also apply to ISPs? > Laroia argued that Pai is being hypocritical given his opposition to regulation for telecom providers. Aren't people who favor regulation for telecom providers but not platforms also hypocritical then?