2 ms·
But you are also going two generations backwards with the CPU, albeit with extra cores. It doesn't make sense. It seems like they should be offering the Pro's w
by D13Fd 6y ago
But you are also going two generations backwards with the CPU, albeit with extra cores. It doesn't make sense. It seems like they should be offering the Pro's with an A14X or equivalent by now.
I wonder if they are holding it up because it will use the same CPU as whatever is in the ARM Macbooks.
- mrkstu 6y agoThat's what I'm assuming. Also with APPLESi Macs, they're natively running iPad apps, so there is some kind of chance they meld the Pro line and the MacBook line into a single device capable of running both platform's Apps, though I don't actually expect that gen1 of the new platform.
- kmeisthax 6y agoOr Apple doesn't have enough TSMC 5nm inventory to make both A14 and it's big-chungus cousin and launch everything at the same time. That would also explain why they launched iPad Air a month before iPhone. The former is a lower-demand product so you could totally launch that one first when yields are lower.