3 ms·
No need to mention them by name. Just use the AGPL, for they are all irrationally allergic to it. EDIT: notice that usage of the AGPL produces the desired eff
by enriquto 6y ago
No need to mention them by name. Just use the AGPL, for they are all irrationally allergic to it.
EDIT: notice that usage of the AGPL produces the desired effect, while still being free software (which it wouldn't be the case if you excluded specific users in your license terms).
- ojosilva 6y agoAGPL may go too far sometimes, as to intimidate companies from using an opensource project internally, and not necessarily as a (user-facing) service as in the case with the OP and AWS. That's due to fact that AGPL's _user interaction_ clauses can be too vague in legal terms, in a way that many internal use cases could be litigated as a user interaction over a network. It has been discussed before here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16636963 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16636963