> And them holding this information until 3 weeks before the election points, after having it for over a year, further points it to being false informations. W

> And them holding this information until 3 weeks before the election points, after having it for over a year, further points it to being false informations. While I'm not arguing whether the allegations are true or not, I don't think timing your most valuable opposition research findings makes things automatically false. And in my opinion, these huge platforms that are basically monopolies should not be censoring things based on whether they think something is true or false. It's tempting to believe that every issue is either clearly true or clearly false, in most fields that is not the case and I don't want @jack deciding what's "safe" for me to see.