3 ms·
A blacksmith is a specialized trade. You cant make up a new definition for an adjective and then use the nonstandard definition to make your point. Division of
by vikramkr 6y ago
A blacksmith is a specialized trade. You cant make up a new definition for an adjective and then use the nonstandard definition to make your point. Division of labor is synonymous with specialization. If you don't like it, make up a new term for what you want to convey.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour
- ywei3410 6y agoLeaving aside the fact whether a blacksmith represents a specialist trade; in my post I specifically alluded to a /more/ specialist blacksmith which /only/ made spoons as an illustration of extreme specialization, I believe that my point still stands — that, I challenge your three assertions: 1) Specialization leads to more autonomy 2) Extreme specialization is as "old as civilization" 3) Extreme specialization leading directly to prosperity as an idea is older than the 18th century On 1) I don’t see any further arguments on your side; so I assume that you have no qualms with such a correction. On 2) I believe that I’ve adequately addressed your concerns — I acknowledge /Plato/ specifically in my reply as shown in your link and my critique on "Ancient theories" is covered in a previous post. The last point overlaps with the 2nd point and I have found no criticisms to the contrary in your answers. On semantics and pendantry of terms I’m disinterested — we could debate all day and I could argue that the very term "Division of Labour" originated in Adam Smith’s work [1] and therefore isn’t the same as specialization. Such a debate would neither be useful nor productive. [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/division%20of%20labor https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/division%20of%20l...