I don't see this as a case where a weak party is unable to fairly attack the powerful. Even without outing the investors, many founders are currently doing the

I don't see this as a case where a weak party is unable to fairly attack the powerful. Even without outing the investors, many founders are currently doing the necessary research to identify the investor and will blacklist him. I think we should keep in mind that: 1) The accusations are currently unsubstantiated 2) The reputational damage to the investor is already significant and largely irreversable 3) Outing the investor here will significantly increase the reputational damage to the investor Given the above, I really don't see how it's fair to out the investor before substantiating the accusations or giving the investor time to respond.