4 ms·

"Does this mean that when their social revolution is complete I will hang from the gallows pole because my named social media accounts do not account for me act

"Does this mean that when their social revolution is complete I will hang from the gallows pole because my named social media accounts do not account for me actively promoting their cause?" Yes, it does mean that. They're saying so explicitly.

nemo44x 6y ago
And I think it’s important to highlight as you have. People will say “well they don’t really _mean_ that”, etc. but they should be taken at their word. They do.
- nobody9999 6y ago
  >And I think it’s important to highlight as you have. People will say “well they don’t really _mean_ that”, etc. but they should be taken at their word. They do. And who is "they"? Specifically. Not some amorphous "group" like "progressives" or "the left" or "SJWs". I'm not being snarky here. It seems to me that one of the most damaging trends we're seeing is equating a hundred million (and more) people with the loudest, most obnoxious and nasty .01%. Painting folks with such a broad brush is a recipe for division, conflict and mayhem. Assuming that someone with a Trump bumper sticker is a dyed-in-the-wool racist and white supremacist fascist is stupid in the extreme. And so is assuming that someone with a Biden bumper sticker is a totalitarian monster bent on total mind control. People are individuals and should be assessed and measured as such. It's intellectually lazy to just stick anyone who doesn't share your beliefs about Trump or Biden or abortion or gun rights or any of a hundred other contentious issues into a big box called "enemies." And when you do so, you play right into the hands of the tiny group of folks who want to profit (politically, economically or both) from dividing us. You have the choice not to do so. It's up to you and me and everyone else to step up and judge people on their individual actions, not some invented "in" or "out" group.

nemo44x 6y ago

And I think it’s important to highlight as you have. People will say “well they don’t really _mean_ that”, etc. but they should be taken at their word. They do.

nobody9999 6y ago
>And I think it’s important to highlight as you have. People will say “well they don’t really _mean_ that”, etc. but they should be taken at their word. They do. And who is "they"? Specifically. Not some amorphous "group" like "progressives" or "the left" or "SJWs". I'm not being snarky here. It seems to me that one of the most damaging trends we're seeing is equating a hundred million (and more) people with the loudest, most obnoxious and nasty .01%. Painting folks with such a broad brush is a recipe for division, conflict and mayhem. Assuming that someone with a Trump bumper sticker is a dyed-in-the-wool racist and white supremacist fascist is stupid in the extreme. And so is assuming that someone with a Biden bumper sticker is a totalitarian monster bent on total mind control. People are individuals and should be assessed and measured as such. It's intellectually lazy to just stick anyone who doesn't share your beliefs about Trump or Biden or abortion or gun rights or any of a hundred other contentious issues into a big box called "enemies." And when you do so, you play right into the hands of the tiny group of folks who want to profit (politically, economically or both) from dividing us. You have the choice not to do so. It's up to you and me and everyone else to step up and judge people on their individual actions, not some invented "in" or "out" group.