3 ms·
Even if that scenario is true, there is zero evidence to corroborate it, nor has there been any concluded official investigation into the matter. I don't think
by 0xC0ncord 6y ago
Even if that scenario is true, there is zero evidence to corroborate it, nor has there been any concluded official investigation into the matter. I don't think it's fair for Twitter to execute that portion of their policy based on assumption alone.
- nobody9999 6y ago> Even if that scenario is true, there is zero evidence to corroborate it, I'm not saying that there is. That's just my understanding of Twitter's reasoning, not a defense of them or anyone else. Don't shoot the messenger, eh?
- Natsu 6y agoMeanwhile Steve Scully was suspended, reportedly because his twitter account was not hacked, as previously claimed, so sometimes the "hack" claims are spurious and need time to be sorted out.
- scarmig 6y agoThere's zero evidence to corroborate anything, though, including plausible scenarios where publishing this information is either illegal or foreign electoral interference or both. And, as far as it goes, not even the Post's story has any evidence to verify it. Even the emails' authenticity is still in question, which would be trivial to verify if Giuliani and the Post simply released the raw emails instead of image files.