3 ms·
Who cares, the censoring ended up spreading the story. If you are all so unbiased, why can't you just read both sides of the story - it is not like the article
by 533474 6y ago
Who cares, the censoring ended up spreading the story. If you are all so unbiased, why can't you just read both sides of the story - it is not like the article has disappeared from the internet...
- 75dvtwin 6y agobecause we do not want corporations claiming protections that they do not deserve. Editorializing content by twitter's own employees, or by crowd-sourcing, is still editorializing. So Twitter and FB, HN and others are publishers, not platforms. Claiming legal shields that apply to platforms, therefore, is not legal. This is like claiming taxable deduction of a charity, while being a for-profit-business.