I totally take your point, especially the second paragraph, and agree. Maybe it's the deep cynic in me that tends to read these articles as another "oh look Wi

I totally take your point, especially the second paragraph, and agree. Maybe it's the deep cynic in me that tends to read these articles as another "oh look Windows bad" write up, rather than analyse what can happen if a stealthy attacker gains access to your machine and covers their footprints. These write ups get passed around in a sensationalised manner with very little thought about or understanding that the OS was functioning correctly given their user privileges.