4 ms·
It didn't happen overnight. 2016 U.S elections changed things a lot. Spreading misinformation is not free speech.
by senthil_rajasek 6y ago
It didn't happen overnight.
2016 U.S elections changed things a lot.
Spreading misinformation is not free speech.
- colordrops 6y agoYes, it is.
- andrew_ 6y agoWhat? It absolutely is. A lie is covered under free speech. One can say anything under that doctrine.
- millzlane 6y agoThis is not true and does not cover fraud.
- andrew_ 6y agoincorrect. you're conflating action with speech. engaging in fraud is not speech. If I told you that I owned a hedge fund and would make you 10x returns, that's speech. If I take your money with the promise of 10x returns and enroll you in a scheme, that's an action.
- 8note 6y agoIt's certainly possible to twist this situation around to where I don't give you money, like giving it to the guy right next to you. The action there is separate from the speech. I imagine for these disinformation type campaigns, the action is voting
- millzlane 6y ago>If I told you that I owned a hedge fund and would make you 10x returns, that's speech. If I gave you money based on that speech it would be hard to argue in court that you didn't engage in fraud. I'm not a lawyer, so I'll agree with you.
- andrew_ 6y agothe sentence immediately following the one you quoted asserts as much. are you agreeing or trying to make the same point with different words?
- devilduck 6y agoSpeech is an action.
- senthil_rajasek 6y agoNot without consequences. As a recent example Alex Jones reversed his conspiracy theories on the threat of a lawsuit. Spreading misinformation comes with penalty. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting_conspiracy_theories https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School...
- andrew_ 6y agoThe consequences of free speech is another beast altogether to be sure.
- RIMR 6y agoFreedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence. If I sell you a bar of lead painted gold, and tell you that it's solid gold, I can still be held responsible for fraud. My words would constitute a crime. Now, if I told you explicitly that it was lead, but you decided to pay the gold price of your own free will, then I would be okay. It would literally be the words I used to that constituted the crime. Lying isn't free speech in plenty on contexts. Go file a false police report and find out what happens.
- andrew_ 6y agoIt's still free speech. It just comes with consequences. The OP doesn't dispute that. Why is it that folks are so eager to run to this as if it were an argument, as if it somehow invalidates that speech is a freedom?
- nowandlater 6y agoWho gets to decide whether I'm being misinformed or not?
- wesleywt 6y agoShould a private platform allow misinformation on his platform?
- notadev 6y agoMisinformation is such an Orwellian term, considering most "facts" and "fact checking" are subjective unless it's hard numbers, but even using numbers and stats isn't enough anymore because even they must be interpreted within the context of contradictory concepts like a persons lived experience.
- JoeAltmaier 6y agoNot so muddy as that - the exact truth may be hard to pinpoint. But outright falsehoods are still pretty plain.
- lurchpop 6y agoOr there’s cases like WMDs or “Assad gassed his own people” which are outright frauds coming from the establishment who determines what is factual.