I don't think there is a real "right to freedom from violent crime", at least not in the enforceable sense. I would say there is a moral duty not to commit vio

I don't think there is a real "right to freedom from violent crime", at least not in the enforceable sense. I would say there is a moral duty not to commit violence against others, and there is a moral right to defend one's self, but I don't see how you really guarantee "right to freedom from violent crime", so it really seems more like a dubious promise. This may be a consequence of my general skepticism of positive rights.