32 ms·
I hate that they don't even tell you what you violated, like I'm sure this just causes more escalation and worse negative feelings for basically getting no addi
by sct202 6y ago
I hate that they don't even tell you what you violated, like I'm sure this just causes more escalation and worse negative feelings for basically getting no additional information.
- ProAm 6y agoThis should be illegal if there is no way to contest/appeal.
- gowld 6y agoIt's the reverse. It's often illegal to divulge the content of a violation.
- chrisshroba 6y agoDo you have a source for that? How could that possibly be illegal?
- jeroenhd 6y agoIllegal? Unlikely. A bad business move? Definitively. As far as I know, the reason no company divulges information like this is to stop the endless protests and appeals from people. Dealing with people who believe they've done nothing wrong even though they have is tiresome and expensive and the more information you give them, the more ammunition they have to protest. The result is innocent people like (presumably) OP's husband getting shafted by a short email without any details, but it's finanicially unattractive to change the system so without court or legislative action I doubt Google will improve their services any time soon.
- jagger27 6y agoI'm not lawyer, and I'm not an American, but doesn't this sorta fall under the 6th Amendment?
- dragonwriter 6y agoNo. The Sixth Amendment applies to criminal action by the government. Google isn’t the government, and even if we were to pretend they were, they are neither applying a criminal law nor imposing the kind of punishments which are inherently criminal no matter how the law authorizing them is characterized, so the Sixth Amendment is far from applicable. Were they the government, either 5th (federal) or 14th (state) Amendment due procesos rights might be an issue, but, again, Google is not the government.