4 ms·
> IMO they shouldn’t allow reviews on public company profiles until there is a critical mass of reviews such that any 1 review won’t dramatically swing the star
by monoideism 6y ago
> IMO they shouldn’t allow reviews on public company profiles until there is a critical mass of reviews such that any 1 review won’t dramatically swing the star rating
Are you this accomodating towards potential employees? Such as, if a potential employee got a single very bad recommendation from one past employer, or one negative past online experience or reputation hit?
I don't know, you may well be, but I suspect most companies are not.
Most reasonable people will take the size of a company into consideration when looking at reviews on GlassDoor (at least in the last, looks like it's no longer worth looking at now). So a single bad review for a small company would not be a deal breaker for me. It's the patterns I look for.
Hopefully, you're doing the same when hiring.
- cj 6y ago> Are you this accomodating towards potential employees? Yes. 1) Reference checks are the very last stage of our hiring process. If you made it that far, we've already made the decision to hire you (assuming references come back in check). 2) If a reference reveals something negative that we didn't know previously, we would give the candidate an opportunity to address it. But you're right, large companies may be less forgiving, especially if reference checks come early in the process. > one negative past online experience or reputation hit? Similarly, I dislike that it's not possible to dispute Google search results when someone searches your full name.