3 ms·
> Sure, but this will not be adjudicated on twitter. I agree with this, but I think Facebook & Twitter shot themselves in the foot by allowing rampant & salaci
by holler 6y ago
> Sure, but this will not be adjudicated on twitter.
I agree with this, but I think Facebook & Twitter shot themselves in the foot by allowing rampant & salacious accusatory headlines to run across their platform unhindered during the past 4 years. There are numerous examples from alleged pee tapes to collusion, and general he said she said.
That's the issue I see at least.
- hackinthebochs 6y agoI agree with that. But the issue is how do you stop people from talking about an alleged pee tape compared to stopping the spread of a specific story from a handful of sources. These are two very different problems. So I have sympathy for the position they are in and the difficulty in being consistent with their policies given the vast range of ways manipulative information can be spread.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- holler 6y agoSuper weird, was suddenly downvoted on both comments twice, but anyways > So I have sympathy for the position they are in and the difficulty in being consistent with their policies given the vast range of ways manipulative information can be spread. I think the true test will be how this is held up in the future. Of course we're in the middle of an insane political divide, but eventually we'll be past it, and next time there will be new candidates, and each time beyond that. So the litmus test will be whether the rules are fair and applied equally as time goes on.