4 ms·
so many stories about trump are later proven to be fake or unsubstantiated such as the russian bounties, that he owes money to russia, the steele dossier etc...
by ffggvv 6y ago
so many stories about trump are later proven to be fake or unsubstantiated such as the russian bounties, that he owes money to russia, the steele dossier etc... and his tax returns were also stolen or hacked
yet ofc they aren’t censored
- colordrops 6y agoI hate trump and can't wait for him to disappear but I can still admit that he was unfairly smeared and severely attacked by the media. It just backfires and leads to people not trusting both sides
- giardini 6y agoffggvv says >"so many stories about trump are later proven to be fake or unsubstantiated such as the russian bounties, that he owes money to russia, the steele dossier etc... and his tax returns were also stolen or hacked"< By now you should understand the Democratic Party's news cycle: a) Make up a message (something, anything bad) and present it to the press as a Presidential abomination, b) Get Democratically-favored media to repeat/embellish the rumour, c) Get Democratic - favoring prosecutors, government spokesmen, bureaucrats, college professors, or outside "experts" to repeat the rumor and to fabricate supporting "evidence", d) Call for investigations in the House of representatives [which the Democrats currently control], e) Ask representatives to go on record to news media concerning the fabricated messages, f) Invoke every right under the sun in support of the false message: e.g., "free speech is being violated", "trial w/o jury", "conspiracy", etc. g)When a new fabrication is concocted, drop the current claims or say they were a Russian or Republican conspiracy, and go to the new fabrication. Never follow-up or complete investigations into past false messages. Rinse, repeat; IOW lie, lie, lie and lie again. Recently Democrats have added to this recipe the following: Bring out the mob, shout and scream, burn down the police station! Every Democrat, from the lowliest Antifa street slug to Nancy Pelosi follows the same formula. They're political thugs who give the Thuggees: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thuggee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thuggee a bad name. Why? b/c their behavior will kill entire societies of people and their governments, not merely individuals as did the Thuggees.
- augustt 6y agoCan you add some more steps to the flow chart? wondering how insane we can sound here.
- giardini 6y agoI think I captured the essential steps of the process. Yes, parts of it (in particular, mob/group behavior) I would characterise as manifestations of insanity, but most of the steps are very rationally planned and executed. You could add Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" if you want more detail on the "how it is done" part: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals#The_Rules https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals#The_Rules
- augustt 6y agoReally interesting, thanks. I didn't realize my fellow democrats were using a formula - must have missed that brief from Soros.
- donmcronald 6y agoSo where are you finding out the truth about all this stuff? I'd love to have an unbiased news source to rely on.
- giardini 6y agoYou say in another post you're not American. What is your investment in the situation?
- dillondoyle 6y agowhat? Russian bounties and Trump's knowledge of it is fact, so is that Trump saying “I have never discussed it with him [putin]”