5 ms·
No, it’s not fake. You can’t provide proof that it’s fake. You’re going off a political agenda. There’s a picture of hunter smoking a crack pipe!
by zalkota 6y ago
No, it’s not fake. You can’t provide proof that it’s fake. You’re going off a political agenda. There’s a picture of hunter smoking a crack pipe!
- uncoder0 6y agoTo preface my comment, I think using Hunter's drug problem for political gain is tasteless. Despite that I find it abhorrent that Twitter is not allowing users to post the photo instead it is instantly causing accounts to get locked. https://twitter.com/search?q=hunter%20locked%20pipe&src=typed_query&f=live https://twitter.com/search?q=hunter%20locked%20pipe&src=type...
- messick 6y agoWow! Bad news for Hunter’s election campaign!
- CyberDildonics 6y agoDo people really fall asleep with crack pipes in their mouth?
- centimeter 6y agoI’ve done it before.
- voldacar 6y agoI believe it's a meth pipe actually
- untog 6y agoA core assertion in the article is demonstrably fake. Biden did not pressure Ukraine to fire a prosecutor that was investigating Burisma. It's something Trump has repeated countless times and something that's been proven false countless times, but the Post still stated it as fact in the article. Besides, the burden of proof applies here. "You can't prove it's not fake" is not a sensible approach. The burden is on the accuser to prove that the story is true, and the Post story does not do that.
- dsclough 6y agoI don't know much about this situation but is Biden not describing exactly this situation here? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jyT1rnW9fA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jyT1rnW9fA
- jasonlotito 6y agoNo.
- untog 6y agoNo. Biden did push for a prosecutor to be fired, something that the administration and other governments agreed on (the prosecutor was corrupt). But the prosecutor was not investigating Burisma.
- nwellnhof 6y agoWell, he was definitely investigating Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky. The prosecutor's office seized several of his houses and other property in February 2016 [1]. Ten days later, Biden urged Poroshenko to fire the prosecutor. Another four days later, the prosecutor was asked to resign. [1] https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/322395.html https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/322395.html
- zaroth 6y agoPeople claim Biden didn’t pressure to fire the prosecutor (even Twitter lied about this yesterday). When presented with the video of Biden admitting to it in his own words; he pressured to fire the prosecutor, but the prosecutor wasn’t investigating Burisma. When shown that the prosecutor was actively investigating Burisma; well he pressured to get the prosecutor fired who was investigating Burisma, but it was in the national interest! I’m not sure if there’s another round in the typical exchange. Best to just skip to the last phase to move the conversation forward.
- AndrewBissell 6y ago> A core assertion in the article is demonstrably fake. Biden did not pressure Ukraine to fire a prosecutor that was investigating Burisma. Biden did pressure Ukraine to fire that prosecutor, that's not in dispute, he's on video saying he did it. What is in dispute is whether he did it out of a corrupt motivation to benefit his son and the business he was working for. That's not asserted in the article. It merely lays out the timeline of events -- granted, in an order which is meant to point the reader in a given direction. They even include a section with the Biden campaign's take on the prosecutor's firing.
- wesleywt 6y agoYour political agenda is quite clear.