3 ms·
That's the how, but not the why. A free flow of information is a net good. Restricting information is a net bad. Western society learned this 400 years ago. T
by goodluckchuck 6y ago
That's the how, but not the why.
A free flow of information is a net good. Restricting information is a net bad. Western society learned this 400 years ago.
These are the same arguments which were used against the printing press, now being used against the internet, fighting against a new enlightenment the same way that the church fought to maintain their monopoly on knowledge.
All combating "extremism" does is protect entrenched stakeholders from the truth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapere_aude https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapere_aude
- WarOnPrivacy 6y agoA free flow of information is a net good - by default. From this point, publicly visible information that consistently shows to be counterproductive could be reasonably restricted from the highest volume platforms. 1 zillion loopholes ought to be enough for anyone.