> No single person can set the amount of risks he wants to take, it has to be decided globally. globally is a bit of a stretch, but people already do this on a

> No single person can set the amount of risks he wants to take, it has to be decided globally. globally is a bit of a stretch, but people already do this on a local level. this is what is happening when the government imposes/relaxes restrictions on the number of people that can be at an indoor gathering, the types of businesses that are allowed to be open, whether restaurants can offer indoor seating, etc. as long as the person isn't exceeding the limits set by their democratically elected government, shouldn't they be free to set their own risk tolerance?