> You tried to twist my words. I did not try to twist your words. If I did, it was entirely unintentional. > I called the content bullshit and not one of thos

> You tried to twist my words. I did not try to twist your words. If I did, it was entirely unintentional. > I called the content bullshit and not one of those services say it is. You said: > I applaud YouTube, Twitter and FB primarily for trying to not facilitate distribution of bullshit all because free speech. I may have misunderstood what you were trying to say, but it sounded to me like you were happy these services were trying to filter out bullshit. > Anything they ban is considered to be violation of their ToS. If you have a dispute with the determination, you can file a lawsuit against them and have a judge determine if it was a violation of their ToS. I'm not claiming anything about the legality of what they're doing. Only that I disagree with filtering content based on an arbitrary definition of "bullshit". If that is not what you were arguing, then I apologize for my misunderstanding.